Film noir and the femme fatale
After World War II, many American film critics were enamored with European film and showed a somewhat snobby derision for movies coming out of the American studio system. But at the same time, American movies were flooding Europe, much of which had been cut off from pop culture in America during the war. In France in particular, there was an explosion of goodwill toward the U.S., who was seen as the main architect of France's liberation from Nazi occupation in 1944. Part and parcel of this was a growth of interest in American movies made during the war and after.
As they enthusiastically watched these movies with relatively fresh eyes, French film critics began detecting a dark current in certain American films. Many of these films were so-called 'B movies': movies produced by the B units that studios used for producing low-budget films designed to be filler for the second halves of double features. And yet, these critics saw them as representing the best of American cinema - a new kind of quintessentially modern film they called film noir ('black film').
Films noirs were typically crime movies - a genre that had existed for some time, and included the immensely popular gangster films of the 30s. But these crime films were different: the heroes and heroines of these films weren't just victims of crime, lust, and betrayal; they perpetrated it. Because of the regime of self-censorship defined in the famous Hollywood Production Code, they were inevitably punished for their misdeeds at the end. However, it was clear that they were the characters that the audience were meant to identify with rather than hate. They weren't just cardboard cutout figures of moral corruption. They were alienated and desperate in ways that seemed to reflect post-war disillusion - especially of the sort that many felt in the explosive, chaotic expansion of big cities that occurred after the war.
Films noirs also had a distinctive look. They typically used lighting that was chiaroscuro - meaning that their cinematography emphasized stark contrasts between light and darkness. The most iconic noir image is, for example, a character standing in a dark room and looking out a pair of blinds through which light streams in broken bands. These films also abundantly used so-called 'dutch angles' - strange camera angles that created a sense of disorientation. Both of these techniques had a lot to do with the severe budget constraints under which these films were made: they allowed filmmakers to hide and distract away from the cheap sets and costumes. But for many viewers, they become icons for the broken, disorienting worlds that the characters inhabited.
Lastly, films noirs tended to work with a distinctive set of character archetypes. The male heroes tended to be tough, stoic, and sarcastic; they wore fedoras and plain working-class suits; they chain smoked and drank whiskey in abundance. They were often private detectives - figures of law enforcement, but working at the fringes. The other men in the film were usually seemingly respectable authority figures - police, businessmen, doctors; but they were, more often than not, corrupt, inept, malicious, or even all of these things at once.
Our main concern in this course, though, will be the figure of the femme fatale. As the name indicates, she's a 'fatal woman', who in her archetypal form leads the hero to his destruction. She oozes sexuality. But her sexuality is at the same time transgressive and mysterious. Often, she is working-class and a so-called 'tramp': she wears explicitly sensual clothing and heavy makeup; she smokes and drinks like a man (as Americans would have thought of it at the time); she speaks as if her every word were a sexual innuendo. But despite exhibiting all the signs of 'looseness', she is strangely elusive. The hero desperately wants her, but cannot ever manage to possess her. In the end, either through accident or manipulation, she grips him with such obsessive desire that they both plummet to their downfall.
The legacy of the femme fatale
Many of the young French film critics who fell in love with American movies after WWII became filmmakers themselves. In particular, a group of them wrote for the film journal Cahiers du Cinema, and then became directors, forming the foundation for the French New Wave of cinema. In their work, they often explored the tropes and themes of film noir.
For example, there's the iconic figure of the actor Jean-Paul Belmondo in many of the films of Jean-Luc Godard - a variation on the hardboiled noir hero:
Jean-Paul Belmondo and Jean Seberg in Godard's "Breathless" (1960) |
But it wasn't just in Europe that the films noirs of the 40s and 50s made their mark. Once American critics and filmmakers, largely under the initial influence of the New Wave, fell in love with film noir, they began exploring its conventions, including the figure of the femme fatale. American filmmakers, though, didn't just recycle the tropes of film noir - they developed variations that referenced but also re-interpreted, critiqued, and re-contextualized those tropes. Such films became known as 'neo-noir'.
Here are just a few of the most notable examples of neo-noir movies that, in particular, focus on the figure of the femme fatale:
Blade Runner (1982): In Ridley Scott's film, he combines film noir with science fiction in order to heighten the theme of self-alienation in ways that were impossible in the mostly realistic settings of classic films noirs. In Scott's future world, genetically engineered androids known as replicants, created by the massive Tyrell Corporation, are used for a variety of off-world tasks (e.g., as manual laborers and sex workers). However, though they are programmed to accept slavery and are constructed to have unusually short life-spans. they are viewed as inherently dangerous, and so replicants are forbidden on Earth.
Harrison Ford plays Rick Deckard, a retired member of the blade runners - a police force tasked with executing replicants who escape their masters and come to Earth. Deckard is compelled back onto the force, and assigned to execute three such replicants who are bent on extending their lives and holding the powerful head of Tyrell Corp., Eldon Tyrell, accountable for his creation.
Deckard is a classic noir hero: stoic, tough, and lonely. And along the way, he meets his femme fatale: Rachael, assistant to Tyrell. Rachael, Tyrell tells him, is a replicant so perfectly constructed that she doesn't even know that she's a replicant. Like a classic femme fatale, she is sexy and mysterious, but in a twist on the classic figure, her sexuality is made uncanny by the fact that she is an artificial construct; and, the great mystery she harbors is whether she is simply a machine, or rather a full-blooded person with a subjectivity all her own.
Ridley Scott self-consciously evokes the classic 40s femme fatale with the character of Rachael, played by Sean Young. |
As Deckard hunts down his prey, he falls in love with Rachael, and, in another twist on the classic noir story, she leads Deckard to his destruction by depriving him of his humanity: through understanding her, he comes to understand that he too is a replicant.
Deckard is led to recognize himself in Rachael's self-alienation. |
The Last Seduction (1994): This film critiques the femme fatale precisely by taking it to a shocking extreme: Linda Fiorentino's character of Bridget. In the beginning of the film, Bridget is set up as a victim - an abused wife. Her husband Clay sells pharmaceutical-grade cocaine to raise $700,000 to pay off a loan shark. But after an argument in which he slaps Bridget violently, she runs off with his money.
Linda Fiorentino as the sociopathic femme fatale, Bridget |
While hiding out in small-town New York, she meets Mike, who tries to pick up on her with confident macho bravado. But she throws him off-balance and sabotages his efforts - not, however, by resisting his advances, but rather by aggressively seducing him and then using him for sexual gratification.
Bridget shocks Mike and throws off his attempts at flirtation by thrusting her hand in his pants to find out the size of his penis. |
Eventually, she draws Mike into a plot to kill cheating husbands for their wives. Her husband Clay, pursued by loan sharks intent on making him pay off his debts, begins to track her down. Mike is wrapped around Bridget's finger, and she manipulates him into agreeing to kill Clay, whom she's told Mike they've been hired to kill by his vengeful wife. At the end, Mike catches on to the deception, and Bridget must kill Clay herself. In the climax, she manipulates Mike into raping her and taking responsibility for the murder, recording the whole thing and then reporting Mike to the police. He is taken into custody and arrested for rape and murder, and Bridget escapes with the money and her freedom intact.
Fight Club (1999): David Fincher's early masterpiece follows an unnamed protagonist played by Ed Norton: an alienated office worker who suffers from chronic insomnia. His sleeplessness can only be treated, he finds, by incessant visits to any and every support group he can find - most of which are for ailments he can only pretend to have. Eventually, he befriends a strange man he meets on a plane - Tyler Durden (played by Brad Pitt) - after his apartment is decimated in a seemingly freak explosion. Durden is a budding demagogue who is slowly building a secret army of men through a network of underground fight clubs; the unnamed protagonist is drawn in, and, while skeptical, participates in Durden's plans to use his army to wreak havoc throughout the social fabric.
Tyler Durden and the protagonist |
Fight Club's version of the femme fatale is found in Marla Singer, a woman whom the protagonist meets while frequenting support groups. Marla is dysfunctional and exudes a dark sexuality, and the protagonist loathes her both for what she is and for what in himself she reflects. He attempts to make arrangements so that he never has to see her again. Tyler Durden, however, has other plans. He beds Marla over and over again in a seemingly endless cycle, while the protagonist becomes more and more exasperated - both with his inability to rid himself of Marla, and with Durden's sociopathic plots.
Helena Bonham-Carter channels the classic femme fatale as Marla Singer |
But in a now classic reversal of the femme fatale, Marla isn't, in the end, a femme fatale at all. Rather, the protagonist is an homme fatale: he is Tyler Durden, operating under the delusion that Durden is another man. As Durden, he has seduced Marla, and as the protagonist, he has rejected her - over and over again. And it's only at the end, when he reintegrates with Durden and his/Durden's ultimate plan - the destruction of the country's banking system - comes to fruition that he and Marla are finally, truly united.
Marla and the protagonist hold hands as the banking towers are demolished by Tyler Durden's many minions |
The Works of David Lynch:
The contemporary director who has most influentially re-appropriated and re-interpreted the conventions of film noir is David Lynch. In his films, his interest in surrealism as a young painter and his lifelong love of film noirs and post-WWII Americana converged to create some of the most distinctive American films of the 80s through the early 2000s. The femme fatale archetype shows up in many variations in his work (including Lost Highway, which we will be watching). However, a couple examples will suffice.
Blue Velvet (1986): Arguably the greatest American film of the 80s, Blue Velvet is often credited with giving birth to the flood of dark, transgressive independent American films that came after it. In Lumberton - a city that embodies a strange version of the American post-WWII ideal of small-town life - a young man named Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle MacLachlan) finds a severed ear in a field.
The severed ear - molding, decayed, and crawling with ants |
His desire to investigate this discovery leads Jeffrey and his new sweetheart - the innocent young Sandy (Laura Dern) - into the twisted, violent underworld of Lumberton. The figure of the femme fatale is embodied by the character of Dorothy Vallens (Isabella Rossellini). Jeffrey finds Dorothy's erotic allure irresistable, and the mystery of her connection to the severed ear leads him to go see her sing at a local club, and eventually to sneak into her apartment to observe her in secret.
Isabella Rossellini projects both brokenness and intense sexuality as Dorothy singing the song "Blue Velvet" |
In one of the most striking scenes of 1980s film - and another reversal of the femme fatale trope - Jeffrey witnesses a scene of disturbing brutality from Dorothy's closet. The ear belongs to Dorothy's husband, who has been kidnapped and tortured by the sadistic Frank Booth (Dennis Hopper) in order to coerce her into repeatedly re-enacting a fantasy scene of mother-rape with him.
Jeffrey watches in horror as Frank brutalizes Dorothy |
Dorothy discovers Jeffrey in her closet, and in her traumatized delirium, seduces him at knife-point. In this way, she both takes a kind of transferred revenge for Frank's assaults, and satisfies Jeffrey's hidden desires. And so, she becomes the femme fatale - but the femme fatale as cruelly victimized even in her own aggression. She leads Jeffrey, not to his destruction, but to the destruction of his innocence - or more accurately, the realization that he was never innocent to begin with. Eventually, Jeffrey is able to take Frank down, but only after Dorothy's attempts to both protect him and be protected by him leads Jeffrey himself to become one of Frank's victims.
Dorothy tries to distract Frank from harming Jeffrey by awakening and then submitting to Frank's psychotic fantasy |
At the end of the film, Jeffrey, Sandy, and Dorothy slip back into the idyllic world of Lumberton as if the horrors they underwent never happened. But a stain on the illusion of American suburban perfection remains: a dead insect in the mouth of an obviously artificial robin on their windowsill.
The mechanical robin |
Mulholland Drive (2001): Mulholland Drive began as a series pilot for the ABC network in the U.S. When the network rejected the pilot, David Lynch scraped together the funding to shoot additional footage in order to re-conceive it as a feature film.
Despite its reputation for being a maddeningly confusing film, the plot of Mulholland Drive is actually quite simple. A fresh, naive young actress named Diane Selwyn (Naomi Watts) moves to L.A. to be 'discovered'. She meets another aspiring actress, Camilla Rhodes (Laura Harring) - the femme fatale whose mixture of raw sexuality and manipulative coldness consumes Diane and leads her to destruction. Diane falls hopelessly, obsessively in love with Camilla. They become friends, and though they have an intermittent sexual relationship, Camilla eventually tells Diane that they must break off the liaison and maintain a platonic friendship. Meanwhile, while Diane's acting career stagnates, Camilla is cast in the leading role of a film directed by one of Hollywood's top directors, Adam Kesher (Justin Theroux). Eventually, Kesher falls for Camilla, and they get engaged to be married. Heartbroken and filled with jealous rage, Diane hires a hitman to murder Camilla. Once the deed is done, she falls into despair and shoots herself in the head.
Diane (Naomi Watts, left) is broken with desperation by the betrayals of Camilla (Laura Harring, right) |
What makes Mulholland Drive so difficult on the viewer is that this relatively straightforward plot is left to the final third of the film. For the first two thirds, we aren't presented with this plot at all, but rather with a fantasy concocted by Diane in her final moments before death; and, we aren't told it's a fantasy - something that we can only pick up after watching the final moments of the movie.
In this fantasy, Diane isn't Diane, but Betty Elms (also played by Naomi Watts). Betty also arrives in L.A. to become an actress. But instead of languishing in failure, she is instantly hailed as a brilliant actress.
Betty stuns the room with a brilliant audition |
In the fantasy, Betty also meets Camilla. However, instead of being Camilla Rhodes, she is a woman with no name. At the beginning of the film, the nameless woman (also played by Laura Harring) sits in a limousine on the famed Mulholland Drive. Just as she is about to be murdered at the orders of some shady criminal organization, the limo is demolished violently by a speeding pair of cars, and the nameless woman staggers down through the slopes of the Hollywood Hills, struck with amnesia. She crawls into a random apartment, and is there found by Betty. At first she claims her name is Rita, but quickly, she confesses to Betty her amnesia, and they begin to investigate her lost identity.
Betty (Naomi Watts, left) and Rita (Laura Harring, right) try to discover the mystery of Rita's identity and the cause of her amnesia |
Through the fantasy of Betty and Rita, Diane tries to have what in real life she could not: an instant chance at stardom; but also total possession of Camilla - who, as the amnesiac Rita, is cut off from the rest of the world and relies entirely on her. But even in this fantasy, Diane can't hold on to any of it. She walks away from her chance at stardom, and gets sucked into the mystery of Rita. In another way - through the fantasy figure of Rita - Camilla once again takes hold of her and becomes the femme fatale that leads her to her downfall. In one of the most surreal sequences in the film, Rita leads Betty to a mysterious club in the a dark corner of downtown L.A. (Club Silencio), where Rita is convinced the mystery of her identity will be solved. There, the stage show reveals that everything up to this point is nothing more than an illusion. Rita's identity as a fantasy-construction is indeed revealed, and Diane is forced to confront her fantasy as such. In the final moments of the film, Diane is haunted by the mocking specters of that fantasy as she slips away into death.
Betty and Rita break down in tears as the fantasy is exposed |
Double Indemnity
This, along with the first two essays I assigned, is your crash course on film noir, neo-noir film, and the figure of the femme fatale. Before we explore the four noir-influenced films that will make up the rest of the course, though, you also need to watch the classic noir version of the femme fatale in action: in Double Indemnity.
After reading the two essays and watching the film, please look at the comments below to find your question assignments. Remember, your responses are due by midnight on Wednesday, 9/10 - the very end of Chuseok weekend.
John: In "Towards a Definition of Film Noir", Borde and Chaumeton compare and contrast film noir with "crime documentaries" - films that portray, in a fictionalized form, some real life crime investigation. First of all, how are they similar? What, though do they claim is the *first* major differences they point out? And, can you recognize any of the features of film noir they point out in this discussion in "Double Indemnity"?
ReplyDeleteAs “Towards a Definition of Film Noir” clearly stated, “crime documentaries” have very unique characteristics; ranging from the narration in the beginning of the film to the series of events that make up the film. While film noir and crime documentaries have some similar characteristics: such as having scenes of violence and adrenaline pumping pursuits, according to the text, there are very distinct differences. First, and foremost, is the difference in focus. “Crime documentaries” usually examine a murder or crime from a traditional outside perspective, where the audience witnesses the crime from those who had nothing to do with it: such as an office or detective, while the film noir examines the crime from the opposite perspective. Film Noir examines the crime or murder from “within” and takes the audience into the planning and execution of their plot. Film Noirs transport the audience away from the perspective of the character solving the crime and into the character actually committing the crime. “Double Indemnity” follows this characteristic of film noir as it the plot of the film takes place through the narration of the perpetrator, Walter Neff, as he recounts his actions that lead to a murder a Mr. Dietrichson. The audience do not follow in the footsteps of a police office or a detective who discovers the murder but rather the perspective of the one who committed. The audience is privy to the fears, secrets, and doubts of the Walter Neff while kept in the dark about everything else. We, as the audience, become empathetic towards Walter Neff, who, in other circumstances, we would revile and prosecute until, by the end, we grow to pity and genuinely sympathize with him.
DeleteThanks, John. Yes, there's an interesting tension in films noirs.
DeleteOn the one hand, they often tell the story of a crime or misdeed from the point of view of those who commit it, and get us to empathize with them. Often, this involved getting the viewer to see the situation as morally ambiguous and uncertain. For example, in "Double Indemnity", we're clearly led - if not to exactly approve of Phyllis and Walter's plot to kill her husband - to at least sympathize with her plight, insofar as Mr. Dietrichson is initially portrayed as a cold, abusive husband.
On the other hand, because the Production Code dictated that criminal and immoral deeds had to be punished by the end of the film, those characters we always made to face up to their actions.
So, the film noir world was often one in which people were faced with moral uncertainty, yet held to stringent moral codes nevertheless. Early on, this, among other things, led film critics to associate film noir with a broader cultural and philosophical movement: existentialism. Of the writers and artists called existentialist, probably the closest analogue here is Franz Kafka. One of Kafka's long-standing preoccupations was characters who were punished, even in the face of moral uncertainty. The most striking example is his novel "The Trial", in which the main character, Josef K, is put on trial and then brutally executed. However, despite his desperate efforts, he is never told what crime he has been charged with.
Nancy: In "Towards a Definition of Film Noir", Borde and Chaumeton compare and contrast film noir with "crime documentaries" - films that portray, in a fictionalized form, some real life crime investigation. The second major difference between the two, they claim, "is one of moral determinism". What do they mean? And, can you recognize any of the features of film noir they point out here in "Double Indemnity"?
ReplyDeleteFrom the excerpt where moral determinism is mentioned, the manner in which police or crime investigators are portrayed is significantly in a good sense, even to the point of glorification of such positions. Police men, in crime documentaries are seen to be men who fulfill their jobs efficiently, are productive, and incorruptible. For example, in The Naked City, the Irish detective is committed, due to the fact that he believes in God and trusts all problems should be solved with justice. Nevertheless, it is mentioned that in film noir police are described as bad, rotten people; they are corrupt and sometimes even murderers themselves. They are at times sucked into problems and cases where crime is the conclusion and punishment is the solution. However, Borde and Chaumeton explain any "over talk" of American police would give them an image that is too controversial. This led them to create the character of a private detective. The private detective stands as a 'mid-way' between what is considered as code of conduct and criminal involvement. Though the private detective continues following the rules his/her job puts forth, it does not stop them from becoming involved in crimes that could lead them to serious consequences. With this, I noticed that in Double Indemnity it is clear the insurance company worker, Mr. Neff, can be said to perfectly fit the description of moral determinism. After he visited the Dietrichson household and explained what the situation around Mr.
DeleteDietrichson's current status with insurance was, Mrs. Dietrichson became interested; not only in Mr. Neff, but also in the amount of money received when accidents occur. Upon hearing this, Mrs. Dietrichson immediately takes on the role of femme fatale and lures Mr. Neff with her attractiveness eventually, teaming up with a mission to kill Mr. Dietrichson
During this whole time of planning Mr. Dietrichson’s death, Mr. Neff does not fail to keep his mouth shut and continue working at the office as if nothing was going on. This way of acting can be compared to what Borde and Chaumeton explained as being the private detective putting himself at risk, yet following the code of his work. Not only could Mr.
Neff lose his job by doing such a crime, but he could also go to jail and serve his time accordingly.
Thanks, Nancy. As I said in response to John's post, films noirs tended to cultivate an atmosphere of moral uncertainty, despite always punishing those who committed crimes or moral misdeeds.
DeleteAs I mentioned two weeks ago in class, one of the anxieties that people have often seen reflected in film noir concerned the chaos of post-WWII urban environments, in which rapid growth and the attempt to recover socially and economically from the war caused a great deal of insecurity and change in the social world. Plus, there was the unprecedented moral catastrophe of the Holocaust - which for many thinkers, artists, and ordinary folks cast a shadow of doubt and skepticism on the accomplishments of Western civilization. Because of these and other factors, you get a great deal of moral uncertainty and even nihilism being expressed after WWII, attitudes which many saw as aptly expressed in the dark world of film noir.
Christine: In "Towards a Definition of Film Noir", Borde and Chaumeton claim that the portrayal of violence and anxiety take new forms in film noir. What exactly do they mean? And, can you recognize these features of violence and anxiety in "Double Indemnity"?
ReplyDeleteThe filming style of film noir can be set to reflect the feelings of anxiety through the sets and lighting. Oftentimes the characters and exchanges are set in claustrophobic settings and events take place either at night or in underlit areas. For example, in Double Indemnity the poor lighting makes things more difficult to see. I felt as though I didn't know if someone else may be in the room and the character may be caught in their schemes at any moment. The mood lighting takes such a significant role in the film, as well as the way the shots are styled to make you feel somewhat trapped, even in an urban environment where you know there must be a lot of space. Near the beginning of the film when Walter Neff is driving to the house in order to get the auto renews signed everything seems open and bright. Yet after he meets Mrs. Dietrichson the scenes grow continuously darker and it seems as if the characters are being taken away from the outside world. At first his office space seems to large and bright, yet when he is confessing to his crimes on the phone call everything seems cramped and dark. There is a certain anxiety a person feels when it's dark and the room seems to be getting smaller and more secretive.
DeleteAs far as violence goes, I think film noir shows the other perspective of crime. Instead of following a hero who will not let their honor be corrupted, you watch the downfall of a man who becomes more corrupt throughout the film. Yet somehow you want to sympathize with the main characters although they lie, cheat, and kill. You can see their life spiraling downwards and there is nothing you nor they can do about it. While a righteous side of you may want to see justice for what they do, another part feels pity or sympathy and wishes for them to live happily and escape. This may even create a feeling of guilt in the viewer. And although there is no gore in the film the violence seems somewhat darker because of the way the killers react to it. While the filming style and musical score of Double Indemnity is so dramatic, the characters, specifically Mrs. Dietrichson, do not seem to feel much remorse for what they've done. The main emotion is fear and anxiety of being caught. (So much so that neither can fully enjoy the reward they originally wanted to retrieve for their crimes.) Yet the rugged hero of sorts becomes more and more guilty as he speaks to the innocent heroine, Lola, and regains his humanity just before he meets his end. Neither ends up truly happy, making the violence of their crimes frustrating as well.
In general I would say that both violence and anxiety are portrayed very well in Double Indemnity, and are also done so in a way different than the Crime Documentaries or Westerns that the public had seen.
Thanks, Christine. That's a nice observation about the shift in the lighting throughout the film. This is just the kind of thing that great filmmakers keep an eye on: many things may not be consciously noticed by an audience, but nevertheless contribute to the overall feel of the movie, the changes in mood, plot, character, etc.
DeleteIn response to John's post, I mentioned that early on, critics closely associated film noir and existentialism. One of the preoccupations of the thinkers labelled as existentialist was anxiety. (I'm teaching about this right now in my World Philosophy class, so it's on my mind.) As philosophers like Kierkegaard and Sartre thought of it, anxiety is an emotion in which I am disturbed by the fact that I and I alone am in the position to determine what I will choose and what I will believe. Sartre, in particular, thought that we tend to turn away from this in various self-deceptive ways: we convince ourselves that the situation is simply moving us along toward our choices, or that an unobtainable kind of moral certainty simply dictates what we will do. This parallel with existentialism - the combination of moral uncertainty with anxiety - is one of the reasons critics associated them together.
Daisy: In the "Movement and Genre" section of "Women in Film Noir", Janey Place argues that film noir is better thought of as a movement than a genre. Why? What are the characteristics of films belonging to this movement, according to her? How do they show up in films of many genres? Lastly, can you recognize any of the features of film noir she points out in "Double Indemnity"?
ReplyDeleteIn her essay Janey Place argues that film noir is more of the movement rather than genre and proves her point by giving a few reasons. First of all she says that film noir can be seen in various movie genres which automatically cannot make it a genre by itself. Also, film noir, just like other movement is relevant to only a specific time unlike genres which survive through time and can be applicable to present times as well as a few decades ago. Janey Place says that movements usually apply to times when society is affected by stress or fear. The main characteristics of film noir genre are the presence of femme fatal figure, theme of desire as well as the dark, unclear setting which emphasizes the moral confusion and the trap that the male protagonist is getting into. Although the unstable environment and confusion of film noir most often appears in detective/thriller/mystery movies its elements are also present in melodrama, westerns, musicals. In my opinion Double Indemnity almost screams film noir. It has the multiple scenes with dark settings that make us focus on the characters and their obsession (Janey Place uses a screenshot of one of the scenes in the movie in her essay). This movie has the obvious famme fatale figure that seduces the male protagonist and by using his strong desires for her leads him into helping her to commit a murder. At the end of the movie the characters are lead to their downfall because of their wrong doings which is also a very common feature of film noir movement.
DeleteThanks, Daisy. One of the writers we'll read later in the course - the philosopher Slavoj Zizek - has written that film noir as not so much a genre as an 'anamorphic distortion' that is used to modify the various genres of film in which it is deployed: like a funhouse mirror that re-shapes your reflection in a distinctive way.
DeleteAs I tried to communicate a bit in the post, film noir has been used in many genres. At this point, pretty much anyone who watches movies and TV regularly will be familiar with many of its themes and imagery, even if they don't know the term or haven't watched the classic noir films.
The legacy of film noir is likely to continue: really prominent directors continue to draw from it. Just recently, I was reading about how P.T. Anderson (director of "Boogie Nights", "There Will Be Blood", "Magnolia", and "The Master") is adapting Thomas Pynchon's novel "Inherent Vice" into a film. Pynchon's novel is a noir set in 70s Los Angeles, featuring a cast of post-hippie burnouts and their brushes with the criminal underworld.
Jeongmin: In the section "The Spider Woman" in Janey Place's "Women in Film Noir", she discusses the iconography of the femme fatale. What are the majors features she points out? And, can you recognize any of these features in "Double Indemnity?
ReplyDeleteSpiders weave webs to trap and destroy a victim. Similarly, the “Spider Woman” weaves a web to trap and destroy a victim; however, its significant comes from the imagery that the spider woman is somehow also trapped in a “same false value system” (53), tormented between myth and reality. These women wish to be emancipated from all sorts of domination, hence wield sexual and violent power, ironically trapping another male character into committing crime—usually murder—and suffocates both the victim and the helper. Throughout many film noirs, according to Place, similar imagery and iconography of the femme fatale repeat, whether consciously or unconsciously. They are violent, often armed with phallic, unnatural power such as guns. Often, they are dubbed with symbol of immorality and dangerousness such as cigar. They are also sexual, which is a characteristic that makes the femme fatale especially dangerous; because of their sexuality, the male characters will be irrationally allured into the conducts and crimes that men of logic and reason should avoid. For example, according to the Place article, Phyllis in “Double Indemnity” is visually described as a highly sexual lady. For one, the camera follows her beautiful, stockinged legs stepping down the stairs, and also, she is first viewed wrapped in a towel, with the absence of clothes, which is a method to maximize the sexual depiction of a female. The femme fatale dominates the camera movement in the start of the film but ultimately loses control of it—for one example in “Double Indemnity”, Phyllis ends up immobile due to death, when she failed to fire a second shot to Neff and Neff murders her with a pistol. This way, femme fatale wishing to be emancipated from former dominations—for Phyllis, a comfortable middle-class life with an oppressive husband—often ends up immobile, by the frightening and destructive results.
DeleteThanks, Jeongmin. Place's article represents a classic feminist reading of the character type of the femme fatale in film noir. The femme fatale both aspires to masculine type of agency, and manipulates the man's erotically charged perspective on her to achieve this aspiration. At the end, though, she is punished for it.
DeletePlace seems to emphasize the need for punishing the femme fatale. As I said before, the external pressure to do so came from the constraints of the Production Code. However, when viewed as an aspect of the narrative internal to the film, it can easily seem as if the femme fatale is being punished for 'not knowing her place'.
There has been a lot of work on film noir inspired by Place: including not only those that shared Place's basic strategy of interpretation, but also those that reacted against it. In the last 15 years or so, an alternative set of readings arose. The latter readings emphasized the subversive nature of the femme fatale over the fact that she was characteristically punished for her attempts at subversion. The femme fatale, on this way of reading her, escapes, so to speak, the attempts of classic films noirs to contain the threat she poses. This idea was partly inspired by the way in which many of the femmes fatales in neo-noir films - which were made after the decline of the Production Code - were no longer punished for their actions. Such neo-noir femmes fatales, these critics argue, manifest more subversive aspects of the character type that were already present in the classic films noirs.
Later in the semester, we'll look at one of the film critics who championed the latter kind of reading: the philosopher Slavoj Zizek. In particular, we'll look at his essay on David Lynch's "Lost Highway". Zizek will argue that Lynch's film plays with the contrast between the classic femme fatale and the neo-noir feme fatale in one and the same film - in particular, in the two characters played by Patricia Arquette.
Yerim: In "The Nurturing Woman" section of "Women in Film Noir", Janey Place contrasts the femme fatale with the archetype of the nurturing woman. How, according to her, is this contrast developed in films noirs? "Double Indemnity" doesn't really work with this contrast. However, can you think of any films or other works that do? Explain how they do so.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteJane Place, in "Women in Film Noir," designates "the nurturing woman (Place, 50)" as the "opposite archtype (53)" of femme fatale. Place defines the iconography of the conventional heroines, in comparison with the spider women, in three dominant characteristics: 1) stability and security 2) passive and static demeanor 3) redeeming capacity.
ReplyDeleteFirst, the traditional women are "'good' but boring women'" who value domestic stability and security over adventurous pursuits of femme fatales. To explain, they remain outside of the ambivalent, criminal milieu in which the femme fatale dwells in and the protagonist borders on. Hence, they remain at the peaceful household, leaving the adventurous and exciting prospects to their shrewder counterparts.
Second, whereas the femme fatales are "exciting, criminal, very active and sexy (51)," the nurturing women are inert throughout the plots. That is, latter epitomizes the maternal, organic communities from the past, for it exhibits immunity to psychological and spatial uncertainty and anxiety that characterizes the world of the dark ladies. The nurturers, without access to her sexuality, concedes in being defined in relation to the male sexuality and readily offers "open spaces, light, and safety (50)" to their lovers.
Ultimately, the antitheses of the femme fatales may represent a sole sanctuary from the twisted landscape of the film noirs. Unlike the aloof vamps, the nurturing women do not hesitate to interact with their men, and "can offer the only transcendence possible in film noir (63)."
Double Indemnity, however, lacks a character whom Place would classify as a nurturing woman. Henceforth, it behooves me to explore archetypical redeemer in another film. A prime example would be Melanie Wilkes, from Gone with the Wind. She makes a stark contrast in relation to attractive and bold Scarlet O'Hara, the protagonist and quasi-femme-fatale. During the Civil War-when Georgia became impoverished-, Melanie silently picks cotton at home to the point she faints, while Scarlet sets out planning her business, and even thinks of contacting Rhett Butler for help. After the war, whereas Melanie stays loyal to
her household and her mentally weak husband, Ashley, Scarlet actively seeks out Frank Kennedy's help, and owns her business in the postwar South. Melanie, furthermore, embodies integration and transcendence, in contrast with Scarlet's ambition and passion. Even when a liaison between Scarlet and Ashley is discovered, Melanie forgives both and sustains her friendship with Scarlet until her death.
Thanks, Yerim. I think the example from "Gone with the Wind" is a nice one.
DeleteOne of the things I think Hitchcock is playing with in "Vertigo" is the contrast between the femme fatale and the nurturing woman, which is itself a variation on a contrast between 'mother' and 'whore' archetypes it's easy to find in many places in art, literature, and, unfortunately, in the ways that ordinary people think about actual women.
Midge, in "Vertigo", is the obvious candidate for the 'nurturing woman'. Twice, in fact, she's referred to as a mother figure: Scottie chides her for being 'motherly' in their first scene together near the beginning of the film; and later, when Scottie is in the mental hospital, she says to him "Mother's here!" (a very odd thing to say, when you think about it).
But Midge isn't exactly the inert nurturing woman, is she? Since I ask you about this on the "Vertigo" post, I won't say more now about why I think so.