Almodóvar on "Bad Education" and "Talk to Her"
Bad Education clearly announces its Hitchcockian roots from the very beginning: with a heavily Saul Bass-influenced title sequence over which plays a piece of music in the style of Hitchcock's most well-known soundtrack composer, Bernard Hermann:
Like Vertigo in particular, Bad Education self-consciously evokes the tropes of film noir: it centers around a story of crime and betrayal in which we are led to sympathize with the wrongdoers, and employs the figure of the femme fatale while at the same time re-interpreting this figure in bold new ways. Indeed, Almodóvar's film - as might be expected from a film made almost 60 years after the heyday of classic film noir - plays the noir formulas in far more radical ways than even Hitchcock was likely to have imagined. However, on reflection, much of what it accomplishes can be understood as only heightening the ways in which Hitchcock used the conventions of film noir to explore themes like feminine identity and obsessive sexual desire.
First and foremost, although Bad Education is, like Vertigo, haunted by a spectral version of the femme fatale, Almodóvar 'queers' this figure. That is, in Bad Education the femme fatale appears in a male guise - the character of Ignacio Rodriquez - who himself takes on a feminine guise: the drag queen identity of 'Zahara'. Like Vertigo's Madeleine, we never see Ignacio himself, but only mediated images of him as portrayed by others. Just as Ignacio achieves femininity through adopting the artifice of femininity - the external trappings (of dress, makeup, and gesture) that mark a feminine identity - several characters construct images of Ignacio through various modes of artifice. We see him through his brother Juan, who impersonates him. We see the character of Ignacio/Zahara in the story of La Visita: Ignacio as a child in Enrique's imagination; Ignacio as an adult, envisioned, in both Enrique's imagination and in the film adaptation he directs, through the image of Juan. We see Ignacio as portrayed in the story of Mr. Berenguer (formerly known as Fr. Manolo).
Many layers of artifice collide: the character of Ignacio from La Visita is imagined by Enrique as Juan, who has impersonated Ignacio, impersonating the singer/actress Sara Montiel in a travesti show |
Almodóvar seems intent on letting the layers of image and artifice blend into one another, creating formidable challenges for viewers, who are often left confused on an initial viewing. For example, he has the same three actors play the characters of Ignacio, Fr. Manolo, and Fr. José in Enrique's imagination of the story of La Visita as those who play them in the film adaptation of the story. He creates not one but two distinct drag personae for Gael García Bernal to portray: the character of Zahara herself, and Zahara's drag show impersonation of Sara Montiel. Lastly, through the course of the film, three distinct actors occupy the role of Ignacio, two distinct actors portray Fr. Manolo, and three distinct actors portray Enrique.
It's in the form of an image that other people construct that Ignacio acts as the femme fatale, using sexual power to exploit and destroy. Juan impersonates Ignacio in order to further his acting career by exploiting Enrique's childhood love for Ignacio. He impersonates Ignacio again in Enrique's film - this time, as an actor. In the film of La Visita, in Enrique's imagination as he reads La Visita, and in Mr. Berenguer's story, Ignacio uses his scandalous sexuality to blackmail Fr. Manolo. And again in Berenguer's story, Juan channels the intense sexual desire that Mr. Berenguer once felt for Ignacio on himself, and manipulates Berenguer into murdering Ignacio.
Ignacio's status as something that never appears, except as a trace - an image that echoes in memories, imaginations, texts, and actions - has two important parallels in the film. First, it parallels the trauma of childhood sexual abuse itself. Despite including graphic portrayals of sex - including a childhood sexual encounter between Ignacio and Enrique - Almodóvar conspicuously cuts away whenever Fr. Manolo is about to abuse young Ignacio. However, despite being unseen, this childhood trauma leaves behind traces for decades afterwards, poisoning the life of Ignacio - who becomes a decrepit junkie - and thus the lives of Juan, Enrique, and eventually Fr. Manolo/Mr. Berenguer himself.
The pedophile Fr. Manolo looks longingly at Ignacio |
The second parallel lies in the phenomenon of drag itself. As many thinkers have noticed, in the adoption of drag versions of femininity, we find a kind of heightened femininity. That is, in an attempt to mute their masculine characteristics, many drag queens and other male-to-female transgendered persons construct an appearance that is ultra-feminine - i.e., one that is uncannily more feminine than the femininity that most biological females project: immaculate makeup, meticulously glamorous hair, ostentatiously feminine dress, movements that are carefully orchestrated to evoke sultry, erotic femininity, etc. In doing so, drag calls our attention to the many forms of artifice that are involved in the projection of a gender identity.
The drag identity most frequently referenced in Bad Education is that of the renowned Spanish singer and actress Sara Montiel:
The first invocation of Sara Montiel occurs at the beginning of Enrique's reading of La Visita. Here, we see the character of Ignacio, inhabiting the stage persona of Zahara, doing a drag version of a famous scene from a Sara Montiel film. The camera is zoomed in on Zahara's backside, and as she turns around, we see that the dress she is wearing is so explicitly feminine as to be absurd: on the crotch of the dress is a thick triangle of material simulating pubic hair; and higher up, we see that breasts and nipples have been painted on its glittery pink surface. Zahara then lip syncs to "Quizás, quizás, quizás" ("Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps"), perfectly imitating every nuance of gesture and expression from Sara Montiel's original performance:
Sara Montiel's original performance
Zahara's immaculate imitation
So-called travesti or drag queen performers were, in Spain of the 1970s, a staple of music hall shows - shows that were widely attended by straight and gay audiences alike, despite the intense prohibition of homosexuality and anything associated with it under Franco's regime. Further, Sara Montiel had, by that time, become a queer icon. This was in large part due to the fact that Montiel occupied an unusual position in Spanish culture. She at one and the same time projected both intense sexuality, and also virginal Catholic purity. Like Marilyn Monroe in the U.S., she was both a sex symbol and 'the girl next door'. In this way, she had the ability to both transgress conventional sexual norms and be accepted by mainstream society - an ability that homosexuals and the transgendered admired and aspired to.
Later in Bad Education, we see Montiel again - this time, as the heroine of the movie that young Ignacio and Enrique watch together: Esa Mujer (That Woman, Mario Camus, 1969). In this film, the two sides of Montiel's public persona come together: as Sister Soledad, she is both the virginal Catholic nun, and the beautiful worldly woman into whom that nun eventually transforms. In a scene that foreshadows Ignacio's return to Fr. Manolo, we see Soledad return to the nunnery from which she came, so transformed as to be unrecognizable by the Mother Superior:
The last major appearance of the figure of Montiel occurs when Juan goes to see a drag show in order to prepare for the role of Zahara in Enrique's film adaptation of La Visita. As he watches, we see the real-life drag performer Sandra lip sync to the song "Maniquí" ("Mannequin"):
In the choice of song, Almodóvar carefully highlights the theme of gender artifice. First of all, in the song, we hear the voice of a mannequin come to life, boasting that, despite being seen as cold and artificial, she has the power to seduce the men of the world. Second, the Sara Montiel version of the song to which Sandra lip syncs is from a scene in the film Mi último tango. In this scene, a chorus line show goes awry when the singer's voice fails. Montiel, who plays a maid who has just arrived in Buenos Aires, saves the production by singing the singer's part for her from the wings as the singer lip syncs. In this way, she captures the hearts of everyone around her, and goes on to become a major star:
Sara Montiel steals the show
Through the use of various performances of the persona of Sara Montiel, Almodóvar deepens the theme of identity - and specifically, feminine identity - already implicit in the character of Ignacio. And, he forges deep parallels between his film and Vertigo, in which we already find a multiplicity of feminine figures that haunt, echo, and imitate one another.
Daisy: In the film, Juan engages in two homosexual affairs, and happily learns to behave as a drag queen for Enrique's film. But on the other hand, it's unclear whether he sleeps with Enrique and Mr. Berenguer simply as means to his ambition of becoming a famous actor, and he makes disparaging comments about 'maricons' (the Spanish equivalent of "faggot"). In light of these facts, how would you characterize his gender identity and/or sexuality?
ReplyDeleteUnlike the other character of the movie Bad Education It is hard not to question Juan/Angel’s sexual preference. Ignasio turns himself into a woman, Padre Manolo/ Sr. Manuel Berenguer openly confesses love and shows obvious desire for Juan and we get to see Enrique clearly enjoying sex with men. However Juan’s case is very ambiguous. He has sex with two men and also fights hard to get the role of a transgender in the movie which deprives him of masculinity. Nonetheless it can be argued that he does not enjoy it and does it in order to help his career and manipulate other men. In the case with Ignasio their sexual intercourse is referred to as an “audition” which suggests that it is a price he had to pay in order to get the part. Judging from Juan’s facial expression during the in intercourse it is also rather clear that he is not enjoying it. Berenguer provokes the sexual relationship that he and Juan begin. At first it seems like Juan is homosexual due to the fact that he accepts this relationship but it becomes ambiguous when Juan tries to film it. Berenguer asks Juan not to film him or at least not to film his face but Juan proceeds doing so, possibly to have it as evidence to Bereunger’s wife in the future. Later on in the movie we see Juan blackmailing him with revealing their relationship to his wife which proves the above-mentioned point. Juan also shows signs of homophobia by calling gay people “fags”.
DeletePeople tend to look up and in a way admire and imitate their older siblings. Juan throughout the movie is shown trying hard to be his older brother. So that and homosexual friendly environment that he grew up with, lead him to engaging in the homosexual relationship so casually. It was beneficial for his acting career and perhaps he thought that a good actor should be ready to take on any kind of role even if it concerned his sexual preferences.
John: "Bad Education" makes complicated reference to the figure of the film noir in ways I started touching on in the post. Can you, in particular, see any parallels between "Bad Education" and the noir handling of crime and violence, as we discussed it at the beginning of the semester?
ReplyDeleteFrom a cursory glance at the two movies, it would be easy to say that drawing parallels between the two films both as noir films would be impossible. First, and foremost, the idea of a femme fatale is completely broken. In “Bad Education” there is no female character throughout the film that would fill the role. However, this is only the case if we were to examine this film with the mindset that the femme fatale character must be biologically female. Therefore, if we were able to redefine the characteristic of “female” into something that was defined by societally rather than biologically, Ignacio would be a fairly good definition of the femme fatale. While defining a femme fatale is critical in defining the film as noir, if we accept Ignacio/Juan as the femme fatale, who becomes the sympathized main character? While Enrique did harbor sexual desires for Ignacio/Juan, it did not destroy him; therefore, the only possible character is Father Manolo. However, while this might be a personal opinion, I can neither pity nor sympathize with Father Manolo. While in most film noir cases, the main character is lead astray by the femme fatale, Ignacio did no such thing. Ignacio had no ulterior motive. He was forced to become the object of sexual desire by someone else which transformed him into the manipulative decrepit person that ruined his family’s life and coerced Father Manolo into funding his plastic surgery. This critical part in “Bad Education” contrasts sharply with the traditional definition of noir film.
DeleteWith the role of femme fatale is firmly established and identity of the sympathized main character remaining dubious, the tiebreaker goes to the the perspective of the narration. In the case of film noir, the narration is from the perspective of the crime committers rather than the traditional crime solvers. While this is not the case in majority of the film, as the perspective is through the narration of Ignacio of his past, it is certainly true in the final scenes where Berenguer outline the details of the Ignacio’s murder. While the majority of the film has very little parallels to the noir films, the ending has every key element that defines what a film noir is.
Christine: One of the things often noted about "Bad Education" is that it is particularly preoccupied with the themes of gender fluidity and the role of artifice in the projection of a gender identity. What do you think are the most important ways in which the film engages with these themes?
ReplyDeleteI believe that Juan mainly embodies the concepts of both being gender fluid as well as projecting his identity. He is an actor in every aspect of his life, both on and off screen, so to speak. Off screen, he uses his sexuality to obtain what he wants. However, he tries to make it clear that he is not enjoying it. He calls the other gay men in the film "fags", perhaps as a way to project his own confusion onto them. He also insists on playing the role of Zahara in the film, doing anything he can in order to obtain the part. While he says that it is because it will boost his career, and this may be partially true, and he is also living out the life of his brother, I think it is possible that he is also living out one of his repressed fantasies.
DeleteAlthough Ignacio is perhaps the "true form" of Juan (since most of the film Juan is impersonating Ignacio), I feel like the transition between genders was more broken. While Juan seemed more beautiful and almost natural as a woman, Ignacio felt more awkward to me. Even with breast implants he was less convincing. This may show the difficulty that people have when they wish to be gender fluid, as well as the difficulty in accepting gender identity. Juan ends up acting out the ideal that Ignacio had dreamed of, being both a beautiful and sexually alluring femme fatal, as well as an attractive man with the same destructive sexual power. Ignacio shows the broken and difficult side of this experience, where as Juan shows the idealized form of it. However, while Ignacio more or less accepts his sexual orientation, it may seem that Juan is rejecting his and projecting his hatred for himself on others. Either way the film highlights the struggles of these themes.
Jeongmin: In the film, two different men are seduced in a way that echoes the seduction of the classic film noir hero: Enrique (who is more sympathetic), and Mr. Berenguer (the not-so-sympathetic predator and pedophile). How would you characterize the film's use of/reference to the classic hero of film noir?
ReplyDeleteNancy: One of the explicit themes of the film is the slippery nature of storytelling. For example, just as the central engima of "Vertigo" is Madeleine (who never appears in the film, except as a corpse), the central enigma of "Bad Education" is Ignacio - who also never appears, except as portrayed by others (in stories, oral accounts, and film). What are the most important ways in which Almodovar deals with the nature of storytelling in the film, especially with reference to the character of Ignacio
ReplyDeleteIn order to embrace the full role of Ignacio, Almodovar in a way, assured the audience in the beginning that the two transvestite friends acted in their normal state and there was no meaning in the actions they did. These events are told by the voice of one of the transvestite’s, named Zahara. We come to perceive it as him telling his own story until scenes change and we see the same person, but now in male clothing, visiting a childhood friend and handing him a script that according to him, has potential to be turned into a movie.
DeleteAt this point, both the audience and his friend Enrique are unaware of the fact that the script was actually written by Juan’s brother Ignacio, who had no major role in the movie. This may have been a mechanism that Almodovar used in order to keep the reasons of Juan’s actions secretive. He having killed his own brother to stop from taking their money would remain a secret to Enrique. Nevertheless, at the end of the film as last scene is shot to portray how Ignacio was overdosed, Juan bursts out in tears due to the similarity to the real story. Almodovar then goes on to show the real pastor telling Enrique the truth causing Juan to come to his own downfall. Ignacio’s story was partially true until his own relative became fed up with having his money spent on drugs, and ended up killing him. Nevertheless, I question the fact why Almodovar did not include Enrique into realizing that he was reading his and Ignacio’s love story but did not come to any suspicion of the ending. Was it because he did not see Ignacio since childhood and did not think it through that in real life, this may have happened to the love of his life?
With these sorts of small details and hints included throughout the movie, Almodovar was successfully able to embrace the essence of mysterious storytelling in that the entire truth was not revealed at once.
Ye Rim: "Bad Education" deals with dark themes like child molestation, murder, exploitation, and drug addiction, and it juxtaposes these themes with a frank portrayal of homosexuality and transgender. What do you think Almodovar is attempting to do with this juxtaposition? Do you think the film is intended to give us any moral or social commentary?
ReplyDeleteIn “Bad Education (2005),” Almodovar’s recurring juxtaposition of criminal themes with homosexuality and transsexuality may mislead the audiences to conceive the film as an indirectly moralistic commentary on non-heterosexual minorities. However, I argue that the characters’ gender orientations and their criminal inclinations are independent from each other, with the former rather serving two predominant functions in the narrative. First, Ignacio Rodriguez’s initial homosexuality and eventual appropriation of female gender identity adapts and radically reformulates Hitchcock’s “tropes of film noir… themes like feminine identity and obsessive sexual desire. (Blog Post, V).” To explain, Ignacio’s Enrira-feminine (Blog Post)” demeanor, in his artificial adornments and gifted childhood singing voice, transcends biological femininity of the 1960s’ femme fatales by accentuating the cinematic “curiosity…the kind that could power a great love story (Almodovar, 227)” that forms the crux of film noir. The audience, as viewers to both Almodovar’s “Bad Education” and Enrique Goded’s “The Visitor,” is precariously drawn to the reconstructed femme fatale who seeks to assert her own sexuality but is unintentionally haunted by Father Manolo’s oppressive molestation and Juan Rodriguez (later Angel Andrade)’s murder conspiracy. Ignacio’s sexuality, which social unrecognition in the 1980s (Blog Post, V) renders the character vulnerable to mysterious criminal liaisons, stimulates the readers’ desire to “keep discover new things about the story it tells (Almodovar, 227).”
DeleteAdditionally, the triangular homoerotic relations between Juan (Angel), Manuel Berenguer (Father Manolo resigned from Church rituals), and Enrique creates a cinematic “chaos (224)” in which Ignacio is relegated to the realm of imaginative reconstructions, with Juan becoming another femme fatale in the diegesis. The three characters, by distorting and recreating memories of Ignacio, make the transgender woman’s story a blend of autobiography, personal homage, and fiction (218).” The most significant feature in the twisted relations is the dramatic irony created by Enrique initially being unbeknownst to Ignacio’s murder by Juan, and that Angel, or Juan, is merely a surrogate guise of his first love. Juan, re-claiming both the off-stage and on-stage identity of his dead brother, re-stages a much more manipulative version of Ignacio attracting his previous molester and previous lover. This, then, elevates the diegesis to “the mixing of stories and tones within a genre (220).”
My arguments illustrate that Almodovar’s stark juxtaposition of sexuality with the criminal, although never “lifeless (222),” does not connote pedantic, causal criticisms of sexual deviance.